Free guide · 5 failure modes
Why context engineering isn't enough
5 failure modes of coding agents — and how to build the harness that stops them.
PDF · no email required
What's inside
Five failure modes, each with its fix.
AGENTS.md and skills steer the agent, but they're probabilistic. The harness is the deterministic layer around it: shared workflows, architecture rules, sandboxes and CI checks that decide what ships.
1 · Green CI, broken prodGreen in CI, broken in production.
The harness: let deterministic checks decide what ships.
2 · Comprehension debtNobody understands the system anymore.
The harness: get flagged when your picture of the system goes stale.
3 · Destructive agentsAgents delete what nobody asked them to.
The harness: wrap the LLM in deterministic guardrails: move rules from context into code.
4 · Hijacked agentsWhat your agent can reach, an attacker can too.
The harness: limit what gets into the agent, what it can reach and what can leave.
5 · Review overloadReview is drowning your best engineers.
The harness: build less, and automate review one step at a time.
The PDF ends with three fixes you can make this week, each with the exact config, and a 5-minute checklist: tick what your team can demonstrate today, then start with the gap that could hurt most.
Free 20-minute call · with Renato
Your first fix, in writing.
Tell me how your team ships agent-written code. Within two business days you get one written page.
Not for you if your team is still choosing a coding agent or running a pilot: this is for teams already shipping with one.
Prefer to write? Send me a message.
- Your top riskThe gap most likely to hurt you, judged against the five failure modes.
- Your first fixA concrete step your team can take this week.
- Do you need help?Which paid option fits, or why you don't need one.
