For teams shipping with AI coding agents
How to stop trading safety for speed
Five checks to keep the speed and stay safe.
PDF · no email required
The problem
Agents scale. Your attention doesn't.
Many agents can run in parallel, but everything they send back still has to fit one person's attention. Reading every line no longer scales, and skipping review is how agent-written code breaks production.
The guide moves trust from reading code to checks: deterministic checks decide what ships, and a human looks only where a check points. It covers five places where that breaks, and how to fix each one.
What's inside
Five checks, each with its fix.
- 1 · Green CI, broken prodGreen in CI, broken in production.Let deterministic checks decide what ships.
- 2 · Comprehension debtNobody understands the system anymore.Get flagged when your picture of the system goes stale.
- 3 · Destructive agentsAgents delete what nobody asked them to.Wrap the LLM in deterministic guardrails: move rules from context into code.
- 4 · Hijacked agentsWhat your agent can reach, an attacker can too.Limit what gets into the agent, what it can reach and what can leave.
- 5 · Review overloadReview is drowning your best engineers.Build less, and automate review one step at a time.
The PDF ends with three fixes you can make this week, each with the exact config, and a 5-minute checklist: tick what your team can demonstrate today, then start with the gap that could hurt most.
Free · 20-minute call · with Renato
Your first fix, in writing.
Tell me how your team ships agent-written code. Within two business days you get one written page.
Not for you if your team is still choosing a coding agent or running a pilot: this is for teams already shipping with one.
Prefer to write? Send me a message.
- Your top riskThe gap most likely to hurt you, judged against the five checks.
- Your first fixA concrete step your team can take this week.
- Do you need help?Which paid option fits, or why you don't need one.