Free guide · 5 checks for CTOs
How do you trust AI code without reading it?
Build a workflow that lets your team delegate code without delegating judgment.
PDF · 20 slides · no email required
The problem
Agents scale. Your attention doesn't.
Many agents can run in parallel, but everything they send back still has to fit one person's attention. Reading every line no longer scales, and skipping review is how agent-written code breaks production.
The guide moves trust from reading code to checks: deterministic checks decide what ships, and a human looks only where a check points. It covers five places where that breaks, and how to fix each one.
What's inside
Five checks, each with its fix.
- 1 · ReviewsReview is drowning your best engineers.Build less, and automate review one step at a time.
- 2 · DeterminismGreen in CI, broken in production.Let deterministic checks decide what ships.
- 3 · UnderstandingNobody understands the system anymore.Get flagged when your picture of the system goes stale.
- 4 · GuardrailsAgents delete what nobody asked them to.Wrap the LLM in deterministic guardrails: move rules from context into code.
- 5 · SecurityAttackers get in through the agent and its code.Keep secrets from agents, lock down CI and run a Ralph Wiggum loop.
Your 5-minute check
Tick what you can demonstrate today.
An empty box is a gap to investigate. Prioritize by consequence, not by the number of ticks.
Which unchecked box could hurt most? Make that your first fix.
Free · 20-minute call · with Renato
Your first fix, in writing.
Tell me how your team ships agent-written code. Within two business days you get one written page.
- Your top riskThe gap most likely to hurt you, judged against the five checks.
- Your first fixA concrete step your team can take this week.
- Do you need help?Which paid option fits, or why you don't need one.


